ArticleCancer research communications2025
Initial-Care Medical and Prescription Costs for Incident Metastatic versus Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer Treatment Delay Thresholds and Metastasis Risk.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- The role of targeted therapy in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The shift of expenditure of medical service for diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer from 2005 to 2014: a hospital-based retrospective survey in Guangxi.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death and among the costliest cancers to treat in the United States. As advanced-stage diagnoses increase, the initial-care cost differences between metastatic (mCRC) and nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (non-mCRC) remain unclear, limiting insights into the financial impact of metastasis and late detection. Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart, the largest US commercial claims database, we examined first-year costs of care for patients aged ≥45 years newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 2017 and 2023, with at least 1 year of medical records before and after diagnosis. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models estimated the impact of metastasis on medical and prescription charges and out-of-pocket expenses (2023 USD) in relation to treatment components, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and hospice care. Among 25,169 patients, 32.8% had metastasis at diagnosis. Treatment and care utilization were consistently higher for patients with mCRC, with the greatest disparity in pharmacotherapy use (79.1% vs. 26.9%), followed by ED visits (65.4% vs. 48.1%), hospitalizations (91.1% vs. 84%), radiotherapy, and hospice care. Medical and prescription charges for patients with mCRC ($353,255 and $5,745) were nearly double than those for non-mCRC ($182,000 and $2,406), as were out-of-pocket expenses ($4,032 vs. $2,144 for medical; $319 vs. $188 for prescriptions). Pharmacotherapy was the primary cost driver in mCRC, followed by hospitalizations and ED visits. Initial-care medical and prescription costs were substantially higher for patients with mCRC. These findings underscore the economic burden of metastasis, highlighting potential benefits and cost savings of early detection and intervention strategies such as routine screening. SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the substantial economic burden of mCRC, with medical and prescription costs nearly twice those of nonmetastatic cases. The findings underscore the financial and clinical benefits of early detection and timely intervention, reinforcing the importance of routine colorectal cancer screening to reduce late-stage disease incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.