ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Immunogenic cell death-related macrophage gene model for prognostic prediction in glioblastoma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an extremely aggressive and diverse type of brain tumor that is associated with a poor prognosis. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a particular form of cellular demise that is closely linked to antineoplastic immune responses. However, it is important to note that the function of ICD in GBM is not yet fully understood. Utilizing single-cell analysis, AddModuleScore, and weighted gene co-expression network analyses (WGCNA), ICD-related genes were identified at both the bulk transcriptome and single-cell levels. Based on these newly identified ICD-related genes, a novel signature for GBM was developed employing three machine learning methods: LASSO, XGBoost, and RandomForest. This prognostic model comprises four characteristic genes: G0S2, NEUROD1, SERPINE2, and LZTS1. The overall survival was significantly lower for the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group in the TCGA-GBM cohort (P < 0.001), CGGA693 cohort (P < 0.001), CGGA325 cohort (P < 0.001), and CGGA301 cohort (P < 0.001). This dichotomy indicates that the riskscore encapsulates a spectrum of tumor microenvironment phenotypes, ranging from immune-permissive (high-risk group) to immune-excluded (low-risk group), with direct implications for therapeutic response. Tumor microenvironment profiling has revealed that the high-risk patients display elevated stromal and immune scores, alongside reduced tumor purity, indicative of a densely infiltrated, macrophage-rich microenvironment. By elucidating the interaction between ICD and macrophage biology, this study establishes a robust prognostic model that surpasses traditional clinical parameters, offering insights into tumor microenvironment immunity and therapeutic vulnerabilities in GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.