ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Plasma metabolites and endometrial cancer: elucidating causal associations through Mendelian randomization.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Uterine microbiota dynamics and new therapeutic opportunities in gynecological diseases.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile observational studies have suggested associations between gut microbiota composition, metabolomic alterations, and endometrial cancer risk, the causal nature of these relationships remains unclear due to potential confounding factors and reverse causation.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using genetic instrumental variables derived from the largest available genome-wide association studies. We investigated causal relationships between specific gut microbiota taxa (Alcaligenaceae family, Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 and UCG014 groups), over 40 circulating metabolites spanning diverse biochemical pathways (including amino acids, lipids, vitamins, and fatty acids), and endometrial cancer risk.
resultsNo significant causal associations were identified between any of the examined gut microbiota taxa and endometrial cancer risk. All 95% confidence intervals crossed the null effect line (OR = 1.0) across different analytical methods. Similarly, comprehensive metabolomic analysis revealed no statistically significant causal relationships between circulating metabolite levels and endometrial cancer risk, including specific investigation of dodecadienoate, a polyunsaturated fatty acid derivative. Multi-method validation consistently demonstrated effect estimates close to zero with overlapping confidence intervals, indicating robust null findings across all analytical approaches.
conclusionsThis large-scale Mendelian randomization study provides strong genetic evidence against direct causal relationships between gut microbiota composition, circulating metabolomic profiles, and endometrial cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.