Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003859›Full record

Observational studyMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2025

Gestational age and models for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.

Aisling Murphy, Jeffrey Gornbein, Ophelia Yin, Brian Koos

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aisling MurphyUniversity of California, Los Angeles, USA. Amurphy@mednet.ucla.edu.
Jeffrey GornbeinUniversity of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Ophelia YinUniversity of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Brian KoosUniversity of California, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is generally identified by measuring elevated maternal glycemic responses to an oral glucose load in late pregnancy (> 0.6 term). However, our preliminary study suggests that GDM could be identified with a high predictive accuracy (96%) in the first trimester (< 0.35 term) by characteristic changes in the metabolite profile of maternal urine. (Koos and Gornbein, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 224:215.e1-215.e7, 2021). The gestational decrease in insulin sensitivity and the accompanying perturbations of the maternal metabolome suggest that a distinguishing urinary metabolite algorithm could differ in later gestation.

objectivesThis study was carried out (1) to identify the metabolites of late-pregnancy urine that are independently associated with GDM, (2) to select a metabolite subgroup for a predictive model for the disorder, (3) to compare the predictive accuracy of this late pregnancy algorithm with the model previously established for early pregnancy, and (4) to determine whether the late urinary markers of GDM likely contribute to the late pregnancy decline in insulin sensitivity.

methodsThis observational nested case-control study comprised a cohort of 46 GDM patients matched with 46 control subjects (CON). Random urine samples were collected at ≥ 24 weeks' gestation and were analyzed by a global metabolomics platform. A consensus of three multivariate criteria was used to distinguish GDM from CON subjects, and a classification tree of selected metabolites was utilized to compute a model that separated GDM vs CON.

resultsThe GDM and CON groups were similar with respect to maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational age at urine collection [GDM 30.8 ± 3.6(SD); CON [30.5 ± 3.6] weeks as they were matched by these variables. Three multivariate criteria identified eight metabolites simultaneously separating GDM from CON subjects, comprising five markers of mitochondrial dysfunction and three of inflammation/oxidative stress. A five-level classification tree incorporating four of the eight metabolites predicted GDM with an unweighted accuracy of 89%. The model derived from early pregnancy urine also had a high predictive accuracy (85.9%).

conclusionThe late pregnancy urine metabolites independently linked to GDM were markers for diminished insulin sensitivity and glucose-stimulated insulin release. The high predictive accuracy of the models in both early and late pregnancy in this cohort supports the notion that a urinary metabolite phenotype may separate GDM vs CON across both early and late gestation. A large validation study should be conducted to affirm the accuracy of this noninvasive and time-efficient technology in identifying GDM.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalGestational AgeAdultAlgorithmsBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInsulin ResistanceMetabolomeMetabolomicsPregnancyBiomarkersGestational diabetes mellitusMetabolomicsUrine

Identifiers

PMID41003859
PMCPMC12474728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.