ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2025
Macromolecular Crowding in Cell Stress and Death.
Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To study macromolecular crowding (MC) in living cells, one needs a method to measure it. Several existing approaches to quantify MC address slightly different aspects of crowding. If we define MC through protein concentration, it can be measured by quantitative phase imaging coupled with volume determination; both can be realized on a standard bright-field microscope. Osmotic cell theory can help identify the essential factors that control MC. Nevertheless, there are still many gaps in our understanding of MC regulation and, in particular, of the interrelationship between MC and cell stress or damage. Experiments show that MC is subject to homeostatic control and returns to its resting values following various disturbances. Severe cell damage causes an accumulation of water and a decrease in MC; however, based on limited data, water accumulation is restricted to one area of the cell (necrotic bleb), while the rest of the cell remains at normal density. Similar heterogeneous water distribution is observed in vacuolated mammalian cells. Intermediate degrees of stress tend to produce dehydration and an increase in MC. Apoptotic shrinkage is one common example of stress-induced dehydration, but the effect may be more general. A hypothesis on its mechanism is proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004006What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.