ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2025
Prion and "Prion-Like" Detection: From Conventional Methods to Microfluidics or Lab-on-Chip Platforms to Monitor Seeding and Spreading of Misfolded Proteins.
Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Misfolded protein neurodegeneration includes several pathologies characterized by the accumulation of a group of proteins that can modify their folding due to intrinsic or extrinsic factors, leading to the generation of aberrant forms characterized by their high insolubility, cytotoxicity, and the ability to propagate among various cell types and regions in affected brains. Due to this capacity and based on the properties of bona fide prions, a large number of "prion-like" or "prionoid" proteins with this ability have been described in recent years. Their study presents challenges, including the development of a detailed understanding of the processes involved in the formation of these insoluble aggregates and in establishing the cellular and molecular bases underlying the process of intercellular propagation. To address these processes, various laboratories have developed techniques to detect their presence in brain or peripheral samples. The detection of these molecules is, as of today, very effective and selective. However, the processes of transmission and propagation are not fully characterized. Indeed, various classical detection techniques have been developed, generally based on controlled polymerization processes and effective detection methods. Nevertheless, these conventional techniques have now incorporated various methodologies employed in other disciplines, such as nanotechnology, which have increased our understanding of these processes and are useful in the development of future therapies and drug discovery. In this chapter, we summarize the current state of the art of these conventional methods, their limitations, and the use of new platforms to deepen our understanding of these processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004056What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.