ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2025
Minimum Exercise Model in Humans Based on Oxygen Uptake and Physiological Parameters.
Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding exercise intensity is essential for optimizing training outcomes and minimizing health risks. This chapter introduces key physiological and subjective parameters used to assess exercise intensity, including heart rate reserve (HRR), oxygen uptake reserve (VO2R), maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Standardized classifications from organizations such as the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) are presented, alongside practical methods like the Talk Test for field applications. Incremental exercise testing is highlighted for identifying physiological thresholds, including lactate and ventilatory thresholds, which serve as critical markers for personalized training. Additionally, recent advances in neuroimaging-including electroencephalography (EEG), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-are reviewed to explore how different exercise intensities affect brain activity. Evidence suggests that even low to moderate-intensity exercise can positively influence cognitive function and cerebral blood flow. The integration of wearable technologies has further enabled real-time monitoring of both physiological and neurocognitive responses. Overall, this chapter underscores the importance of individualized, evidence-based approaches in exercise prescription and highlights emerging methods for linking exercise intensity with brain function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004094What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.