Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41004218›Full record

SynthesisJournal of global health2025

Childhood stunting and cognitive development: a meta-analysis.

Vassilis Sideropoulos, Aisling Draper, Bernardita Munoz-Chereau, Lynn Ang, Julie Elizabeth Dockrell

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vassilis SideropoulosDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Aisling DraperDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Bernardita Munoz-ChereauDepartment for Learning and Leadership, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Lynn AngDepartment for Learning and Leadership, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Julie Elizabeth DockrellDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Childhood stunting is associated with delayed developmental trajectories. While the relationship between childhood stunting and cognitive development has been widely studied, the impact on children's development requires further examination. We aimed to synthesise existing research studies to clarify the relationships between childhood stunting and cognitive development and sub-domains of cognition. Additionally, we sought to examine potential moderating factors influencing the relationship between childhood stunting and cognitive development, and to explore interventions targeted at improving cognitive development for stunted children. Methods: We systematically reviewed literature from 1990 to 2025 in 54 languages. We identified 12 191 studies, of which 35 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. We employed random effect models to calculate pooled effect sizes and assessed heterogeneity using I Results: Our initial model revealed no effects of childhood stunting on overall cognitive development. However, more refined domain-specific analyses showed that childhood stunting was associated with poorer sub-domains, specifically intelligence, executive function, visuo-spatial, cognition, and socio-emotional development in specific geographic regions. Secondary models indicated that the effects of childhood stunting were more pronounced when moderating factors such as demographics, socioeconomic, parent-related and health-related factors were controlled for, demonstrating the critical role of the impact of developmental context. Finally, the exclusive focus on nutritional interventions limited our ability to explore the effects of other intervention types on cognitive development in children who were stunted. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need for further research to better understand these relationships and for the development of contextual interventions to draw robust conclusions and design targeted interventions. Future research should explore standardised culturally sensitive assessment tools, emphasising the necessity of accurate reporting, and the exploration of moderating effects across cognitive sub-domains.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCognitionGrowth DisordersChildChild, PreschoolHumans

Identifiers

PMID41004218
PMCPMC12467485

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.