ArticleJournal of global health2025
Advancing the quality of maternal, newborn, and child healthcare: insights from pilot hospitals in the Kyrgyz Republic.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of medical services provided to mothers, newborns and children at the hospital level in the Kyrgyz Republic.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Improving the quality of care for mothers, newborns, and children in ten hospitals of the Republic of Tajikistan.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Paediatric care in hospitals in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: impact of a quality improvement initiative.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Maternal, newborn, and child mortality rates in the Kyrgyz Republic are high compared to other countries in the European Region of the World Health Organization (WHO). Global evidence suggests that at least half of the maternal and newborn deaths could be prevented with improved quality of healthcare. To address this, we undertook a quality improvement project over two years in ten pilot hospitals of the Kyrgyz Republic. Methods: We assessed the quality of care for maternal, newborn, and child health using WHO tools at the beginning and end of the project. We evaluated the availability and appropriate use of resources, case management, and key hospital policies. We used a standardised scoring system from 0 to 3, with colour coding scores and a display of trends (improved, deteriorated, remained the same). After the baseline assessment, we conducted a complex improvement process including the development of hospital quality improvement plans, updating clinical guidelines, training activities in priority topics, supportive supervision, and semi-annual collaborative quality improvement meetings between hospitals. Results: The baseline assessment revealed many areas of suboptimal care across the hospitals and technical areas. The endline assessment showed improvements in case management practices (baseline mean (x̄) = 1.6 vs. endline x̄ = 1.9) and policies and organisation of services (baseline x̄ = 1.7 vs. endline x̄ = 1.9). No improvement was achieved in hospital support services (baseline x̄ = 1.7 vs. endline x̄ = 1.8). Eight out of ten hospitals demonstrated overall improvement progress across categories; the two remaining hospitals showed no improvement. Conclusions: A complex intervention process focussed on updating clinical guidelines, selected capacity-building activities, supportive supervision, and semi-annual collaborative meetings led to quality improvements in maternal, newborn, and child health. The improvements achieved were still not reaching international standards, highlighting the need for a comprehensive and system-wide approach to quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.