ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Preferences of Patients With Tuberculosis for AI-Assisted Remote Health Management: Discrete Choice Experiment.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preferences for AI-Enabled Health Care Technologies: Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Reporting Quality Assessment Using the DIRECT Checklist.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring tuberculosis physicians' preferences for AI explainability in China: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Alleviating psychosocial distress in drug-resistant tuberculosis: a pre-post study on telephone-delivered motivational interviewing.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis remains a major global public health challenge, especially in low-resource settings where long-term treatment adherence and regular follow-up are critical. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into remote health management has the potential to improve care delivery and patient outcomes. However, evidence on the preferences of patients with tuberculosis regarding AI-assisted services remains limited.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the preferences of patients with tuberculosis for AI-assisted remote health management services in China, identifying key service characteristics that influence their choices.
methodsA discrete choice experiment was conducted among 203 patients with tuberculosis in Hubei province, China. Attributes and levels were identified through a systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, and expert panel consultations. The final design included 6 attributes: interaction method, service provider, service frequency, service content, out-of-pocket cost, and service integration. Each participant completed 8 choice tasks comparing hypothetical service options constructed based on these attributes. Preferences were analyzed using a mixed logit model to account for preference heterogeneity. Additional subgroup analyses were performed to explore variations in preferences across sociodemographic characteristics.
resultsAll 6 attributes significantly influenced patients' preferences (all P values <.05). Participants strongly favored services involving physician oversight (P<.001), video-based interactions (P<.001), and comprehensive content (P<.001), while higher costs were associated with lower acceptance (P<.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that higher-income patients demonstrated both a greater willingness to pay and a stronger preference for physician involvement. Female participants expressed a lower preference for AI-assisted physician-led services compared to AI-only configurations. Patients with higher educational attainment also reported lower preferences for physician-involved services. Age-related differences were not statistically significant. Across all subgroups, cost remained a critical determinant of service acceptance.
conclusionsPatients with tuberculosis expressed a clear preference for high-quality, human-integrated remote health management services, emphasizing the importance of physician involvement and personalized, interactive care. These findings suggest that fully AI-driven models may face resistance and that hybrid models combining AI efficiency with professional oversight are more acceptable. Policymakers and service designers should prioritize affordability, provide targeted financial support for populations considered vulnerable, and invest in digital literacy initiatives to enhance equitable access. This study provides critical evidence to support the development of AI-assisted tuberculosis management strategies that align with patient preferences and improve treatment adherence in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.