Evidence mapPaperPMID 41004469Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Supervised spike sorting feasibility of noisy single-electrode extracellular recordings: Systematic study of human C-nociceptors recorded via microneurography.

Alina Troglio, Peter Konradi, Andrea Fiebig, Ariadna Pérez Garriga, Rainer Röhrig, James Dunham, Ekaterina Kutafina, Barbara Namer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alina TroglioResearch Group Neuroscience, Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research (IZKF), Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-4389
Peter KonradiInstitute of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Andrea FiebigResearch Group Neuroscience, Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research (IZKF), Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Ariadna Pérez GarrigaInstitute of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8840-1770
Rainer RöhrigInstitute of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0032-5118
James DunhamAnaesthesia, Pain, and Critical Care Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ekaterina KutafinaInstitute for Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3430-5123
Barbara NamerResearch Group Neuroscience, Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research (IZKF), Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorting spikes from noisy single-channel in-vivo extracellular recordings is challenging, particularly due to the lack of ground truth data. Microneurography, an electrophysiological technique for studying peripheral sensory systems, employs experimental protocols that time-lock a subset of spikes. Stable propagation speed of nerve signals enables reliable sorting of these spikes. Leveraging this property, we established ground truth labels for data collected in two European laboratories and designed a proof-of-concept open-source pipeline to process data across diverse hardware and software systems. Using the labels derived from the time-locked spikes, we employed a supervised approach instead of the unsupervised methods typically used in spike sorting. We evaluated multiple low-dimensional representations of spikes and found that raw signal features outperformed more complex approaches, which are effective in brain recordings. However, the choice of the optimal features remained dataset-specific, influenced by the similarity of average spike shapes and the number of fibers contributing to the signal. Based on our findings, we recommend tailoring lightweight algorithms to individual recordings and assessing the "sortability feasibility" based on achieved accuracy and the research question before proceeding with sorting of non-time-locked spikes in future projects.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAlgorithmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41004469
PMCPMC12469167

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.