ArticlePloS one2025
Clinical, laboratory and genetic factors associated with smoking in a Brazilian Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) cohort.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmoking is associated with increased morbidity among individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). While genetic factors influencing smoking behavior have been identified in other populations, they have not been studied in individuals with SCD. This study aimed to assess the impact of smoking on clinical and laboratory parameters in a large SCD cohort and to identify genetic variants potentially associated with smoking behavior in this population.
methodsThe Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III) Brazil SCD cohort was established across six Brazilian cities to investigate clinical outcomes in individuals with SCD. Adult participants were interviewed and asked whether they had ever smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. Those who responded "yes" were classified as ever smokers, while those who responded "no" were classified as never smokers. Clinical and laboratory data were compared between the two groups. All participants were genotyped using a customized array, and a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted to identify single nucleotide variants (SNVs) associated with smoking status.
resultsOf the 1,231 adults with available smoking data, 332 (27%) were classified as 'ever smokers' and 899 (73%) as 'never smokers'. 'Ever smoker' status was associated with male sex, age ≥ 40 years, lower educational attainment, and hemoglobin levels above the 75th percentile. In the GWAS, no SNVs reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10 ⁻ ⁸). However, several SNVs demonstrated nominal significance (p < 1 × 10 ⁻ ⁷), including rs11087854 and a variant at position 1059991 on chromosome 20 within the gene AL110114.1, as well as rs701023 in the NCOR2 gene, suggesting a potential association with smoking behavior.
conclusionBiological sex, age, and educational level are associated with smoking status among adults with SCD, and tobacco use appears to correlate with elevated hemoglobin levels in this population. Although no genome-wide significant associations were identified, our findings highlight potential genetic loci-particularly within AL110114.1 and NCOR2-that warrant further investigation in relation to smoking behavior in individuals with SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.