ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Design Guidelines for a Game-Based Physical Rehabilitation System: Focus Group Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Incorporating serious games and advancements in information and communication technologies into physical rehabilitation can substantially enhance the process, provide unique benefits, and improve its effectiveness and efficiency. While recent literature highlights various game-based interventions for physical rehabilitation, there is a lack of comprehensive guidance on how to design and develop systems that effectively address the actual needs of therapists, practitioners, and individuals with physical disabilities. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the intentions, needs, and desires of therapists and other practitioners, as well as to examine the factors and determinants influencing the effectiveness and efficacy of game-based physical rehabilitation, since therapists and other health care practitioners play crucial roles in both patient recovery and the establishment of an effective game-based therapy. Methods: A design science approach was adopted to achieve this research objective. A focus group of 27 participants was conducted to gather feedback, identify user needs, and understand the requirements for game-based physical rehabilitation. The participants first tested commercially available games and then evaluated mock-ups of the proposed game prototypes. Results: This study provides essential design insights and guidelines for designers and researchers, focusing on the practical needs and requirements of game-based physical rehabilitation systems. Conclusions: As proof of concept, these guidelines will be used in the next phase of our research, which involves designing and developing a game-based physical rehabilitation system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.