Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2025
Adopting and implementing an efficacious peer-delivered physical activity program for web platform delivery in survivors of breast cancer: organizational readiness and perspectives.
Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05409664 (Peer Coaching for Physical Activity Promotion Among Breast Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Peer Coaching for Physical Activity Promotion Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Adapting an Efficacious Intervention to Prepare for Implementation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Moving forward together (MFT) program is a 3-month, peer-led, physical activity (PA) program for survivors of breast cancer and has shown effectiveness in increasing survivors' moderate-to-vigorous PA. We adapted an existing web-based platform to the MFT program, created webMFT, and partnered with four cancer care organizations to implement webMFT. PURPOSE: To understand factors that influence adoption, implementation, and potential for maintenance of webMFT at the organizational level.
methodsWe used mixed methods to assess organizational readiness and facilitators/barriers for the organizational adoption and implementation of webMFT. In the preimplementation phase, eight representatives completed the organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) measure [2 subscales: commitment to change (CC) and efficacy for change (EC), score range = 1-5]. After implementation, four representatives also participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were coded by two researchers using content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were integrated.
resultsORIC scores showed high readiness: CC (mean ± SD; 4.42 ± 0.65) and EC (3.98 ± 0.64). Qualitative categories aligned with quantitative results and included: (i) Strong alignment of mission between webMFT and organizations; (ii) Motivation to adopt webMFT to support their communities; (iii) Lower organizational capacity to recruit participants to receive webMFT than capacity to recruit peer mentors to deliver webMFT; (iv) Resource needs-to scale out and sustain webMFT requires dedicated organizational staff time; and (v) Organizational members found webMFT staff helpful, professional, and communicative, which made partnering a positive experience.
conclusionsOrganizational perspectives provided insights into challenges and opportunities for the scalability of evidence-based programs for cancer survivors. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: The Clinical Trials Registration #: NCT05409664.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.