ArticleNature communications2025
Accurate prediction of gene deletion phenotypes with Flux Cone Learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiobjective Design of Growth Media with Genome-Scale Metabolic Models and Bayesian Optimization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Accurate prediction of gene deletion phenotypes with Flux Cone Learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the impact of gene deletions is crucial for biological discovery, biomedicine, and biotechnology. Due to the complexity of genome-wide deletion screens, there is growing interest in computational methods that leverage existing screening data for predictive modeling. Here, we present Flux Cone Learning, a general framework designed to predict the effects of metabolic gene deletions on cellular phenotypes. Using Monte Carlo sampling and supervised learning, our approach identifies correlations between the geometry of the metabolic space and experimental fitness scores from deletion screens. Flux Cone Learning delivers best-in-class accuracy for prediction of metabolic gene essentiality in organisms of varied complexity (Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chinese Hamster Ovary cells), outperforming the gold standard predictions of Flux Balance Analysis. We demonstrate the versatility of our approach by training a predictor of small molecule production using data from a large deletion screen. Flux Cone Learning can be applied to many organisms and phenotypes, without the need to encode cellular objectives as an optimization task. Our work offers a broadly applicable tool for phenotypic prediction and lays the groundwork for building metabolic foundation models across the kingdom of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.