Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006282›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Accurate prediction of gene deletion phenotypes with Flux Cone Learning.

Charlotte Merzbacher, Oisin Mac Aodha, Diego A Oyarzún

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlotte MerzbacherSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Oisin Mac AodhaSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Diego A OyarzúnSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. d.oyarzun@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-5278

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/S02431X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the impact of gene deletions is crucial for biological discovery, biomedicine, and biotechnology. Due to the complexity of genome-wide deletion screens, there is growing interest in computational methods that leverage existing screening data for predictive modeling. Here, we present Flux Cone Learning, a general framework designed to predict the effects of metabolic gene deletions on cellular phenotypes. Using Monte Carlo sampling and supervised learning, our approach identifies correlations between the geometry of the metabolic space and experimental fitness scores from deletion screens. Flux Cone Learning delivers best-in-class accuracy for prediction of metabolic gene essentiality in organisms of varied complexity (Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chinese Hamster Ovary cells), outperforming the gold standard predictions of Flux Balance Analysis. We demonstrate the versatility of our approach by training a predictor of small molecule production using data from a large deletion screen. Flux Cone Learning can be applied to many organisms and phenotypes, without the need to encode cellular objectives as an optimization task. Our work offers a broadly applicable tool for phenotypic prediction and lays the groundwork for building metabolic foundation models across the kingdom of life.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionAnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusEscherichia coliMachine LearningMonte Carlo MethodPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID41006282
PMCPMC12475001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.