Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006305›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

Feasibility of a digital therapeutic for experiential negative symptoms of schizophrenia: results from an exploratory study.

Haig Goenjian, Abhishek Pratap, Cassandra Snipes, Brendan D Hare, Joshua T Kantrowitz, Tshekedi Dennis, Wakelin McNeel, Eehwa Ung, Olya Besedina, Alankar Gupta and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05486312 (A Multi-center, Exploratory, Single-Arm, 7-week Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Treatment With CT-155 in People With Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05486312 nacompletednot on this map

A Multi-center, Exploratory, Single-Arm, 7-week Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Treatment With CT-155 in People With Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorClick Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2022 to 2022Enrolled72ConditionsSchizophreniaArmsCT-155 smartphone app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Haig Goenjian *CenExel CNS, Garden Grove and Los Alamitos, Los Alamitos, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0499-1262
Abhishek Pratap *Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA. abhishek.pratap@boehringer-ingelheim.com.
Cassandra SnipesClick Therapeutics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Brendan D HareClick Therapeutics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6502-3188
Joshua T KantrowitzColumbia University Department of Psychiatry and New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI), New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1127-7016
Tshekedi DennisVelocity Clinical Research, Santa Ana, CA, USA.
Wakelin McNeelBHC Alhambra Hospital, Rosemead, CA, USA.
Eehwa UngClick Therapeutics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Olya BesedinaClick Therapeutics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3429-3740
Alankar GuptaClick Therapeutics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Tim CampelloneClick Therapeutics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-9576
Mariya PetrovaClick Therapeutics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Sergio PeroccoBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Uma VaidyanathanBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Shaheen E LakhanClick Therapeutics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2994-3630
Cornelia Dorner-CiossekBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. cornelia.dorner-ciossek@boehringer-ingelheim.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7375-4724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiential negative symptoms (ENS) of schizophrenia, such as asociality, anhedonia, and avolition, are associated with poor outcomes, yet no FDA-approved pharmacotherapies currently exist specifically to target these symptoms. With the increasing use of smartphones, evidence-based digital interventions delivered by prescription digital therapeutics (DTx) may present an opportunity to address the unmet therapeutic need for ENS of schizophrenia. CT‑155/BI 3972080 (CT-155) is being developed as a smartphone-based prescription DTx for the treatment of ENS. A multicenter, 7-week, single-arm, open-label, exploratory study (NCT05486312) evaluated the engagement, adherence, potential effectiveness, acceptability, user experience, and safety of an abbreviated version of CT-155 (CT‑155 beta). Engagement and adherence with CT-155 beta were measured passively throughout the study using the study app. Change in ENS severity was assessed using the clinically administered clinical assessment interview for negative symptoms, motivation, and pleasure subscale (CAINS-MAP). Acceptability and user experience were assessed using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) along with an episodic user experience survey, respectively. Fifty participants with a clinically confirmed schizophrenia diagnosis were enrolled; 80% were male, 58% were Black or African American, and the median (range) age was 53.5 (23-64) years. At baseline, participants' mean (SD) CAINS-MAP total score was 20.5 (8.3). Most participants (n = 43; 86%) completed the 7-week study. Participants readily engaged with CT-155 beta. Kaplan-Meier retention analysis showed that 84% of participants (N = 42/50) engaged with CT-155 beta (i.e., last app open) until the end of the study period. Daily app check-ins were completed on a median (IQR) of 43.0 (19-47) days of the 49 possible days (88%). The median (IQR) duration of engagement was 11.6 (8.1-16.1) min per session. Additionally, adherence with CT-155 was high, with participants completing a median of 18 (IQR 13-20) of the 21 therapeutic lessons available. After 7 weeks of CT-155 beta usage, the mean change in within-subject CAINS-MAP score was 3.6 points from baseline (95% CI 1.3, 5.8; p = 0.0026; baseline: 20.4 (8.6) Week 7: 16.8 (7.7)). Most participants (91%; n = 39/43) rated CT-155 beta functionality using MARS assessment as acceptable or higher, with an overall mean MARS functionality subscale score of 4.2 points out of 5 points, with 5 corresponding to "excellent" at Week 7. The end of study participant feedback survey showed that 95% (n = 42/44) of participants would recommend using CT-155 beta. No app-related adverse events nor severe adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study were reported. Overall, the study demonstrated the feasibility of CT-155 beta in participants with ENS of schizophrenia. Results from this feasibility study show the potential of evidence-based DTx approaches to address ENS of schizophrenia.

Identifiers

PMID41006305
PMCPMC12475125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.