ArticleScientific reports2025
The gut microbial composition is different in chronic fatigue syndrome than in healthy controls.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex- and menopause-related differences in immune and gastrointestinal symptom architecture in ME/CFS: evidence from factor analysis and structural equation modeling.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Gut Microbiome Alterations in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID-19 Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Dietary intake of live microbes is inversely associated with fatigue and modified by serum folate among adults aged 40 years or more.Maturitas · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiome and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Insights into Disease Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathogenesis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is yet unknown. This study aimed to assess the gut microbial composition in CFS patients versus in healthy controls (HCs). The composition of fecal bacteria was examined in twenty-five CFS patients and sixteen HCs using Illumina sequencing of 16 S rRNA gene amplicons targeting the V3-V4 bacterial gene regions. 143 (46%) of the microbial genera were found only in the CFS. In addition, the gut microbial composition in the CFS patients contained a much higher proportion of the 10 most commonly found bacteria compared to the HCs group. A significantly lower observed number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was noted in CFS compared to HCs (p = 0.045). Significant between-group differences in the gut microbial composition in CFS compared to HCs were noted. The three most discriminating Amplicon Sequencing Variants (ASVs): ASV 191, ASV 44, and ASV 75, were identified as significantly more abundant in the healthy control group compared to the patient group. In addition, the Neural Network (multilayer perceptron) was able to discriminate gut microbial composition from CFS versus HCs with excellent performance (AUC = 0.935). The gut microbial composition is different in CFS patients compared to HCs. Further studies should assess the pathophysiological consequences of these differences as well as the effectiveness of therapies aimed at modifying the gut microbial composition in CFS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.