Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel open-source ultrasound dataset with deep learning benchmarks for spinal cord injury localization and anatomical segmentation.

Avisha Kumar, Kunal Kotkar, Kelly Jiang, Meghana Bhimreddy, Daniel Davidar, Carly Weber-Levine, Siddharth Krishnan, Max J Kerensky, Ruixing Liang, Kelley K Leadingham and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Avisha KumarJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. akumar80@jh.edu.
Kunal KotkarJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kelly Jiang *Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Meghana Bhimreddy *Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniel Davidar *Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Carly Weber-Levine *Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Siddharth KrishnanJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Max J KerenskyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ruixing LiangJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kelley K LeadinghamJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Denis RoutkevitchJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrew M HershJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kimberly AshayeriJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Betty TylerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-6969
Ian SukJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer SonCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nicholas TheodoreJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nitish ThakorJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amir ManbachiJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. amir.manbachi@jhu.edu.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM136577 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREA L COX · 2020 to 2026
$13.4M
Spinal Cord Injury: A Cardiovascular Perspective using UltrasoundF30HL168823 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Denis Routkevitch · 2024 to 2026
$164k
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Inc.) 30 HL168823National Science Foundation (NSF) STTR Phase 1 Award 1938939NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL168823NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136577United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) N660012024075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While deep learning has catalyzed breakthroughs across numerous domains, its broader adoption in clinical settings is inhibited by the costly and time-intensive nature of data acquisition and annotation. To further facilitate medical machine learning, we present an ultrasound dataset of 10,223 brightness-mode (B-mode) images consisting of sagittal slices of porcine spinal cords (N = 25) before and after a contusion injury. We additionally benchmark the performance metrics of several state-of-the-art object detection algorithms to localize the site of injury and semantic segmentation models to label the anatomy for comparison and creation of task-specific architectures. Finally, we evaluate the zero-shot generalization capabilities of the segmentation models on human ultrasound spinal cord images to determine whether training on our porcine dataset is sufficient for accurately interpreting human data. Our results show that the YOLOv8 detection model outperforms all evaluated models for injury localization, achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP50-95) score of 0.606. Segmentation metrics indicate that the DeepLabv3 segmentation model achieves the highest accuracy on unseen porcine anatomy, with a Mean Dice score of 0.587, while SAMed achieves the highest mean Dice score generalizing to human anatomy (0.445). To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest annotated dataset of spinal cord ultrasound images made publicly available to researchers and medical professionals, as well as the first public report of object detection and segmentation architectures to assess anatomical markers in the spinal cord for methodology development and clinical applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesAlgorithmsAnimalsBenchmarkingHumansSwineUltrasonographyMedical datasetObject detectionSemantic segmentationSpinal cord injuryUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID41006445
PMCPMC12475011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.