Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006447›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessment of oral morbidity and self rated health in the Indian geriatric population with a propensity score matched approach.

Illias Sheikh, Vini Mehta, Toufiq Noor, Ankita Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Illias SheikhCentre for Governance and Management of Public Services, Development Management Institute, Patna, 800004, India.
Vini MehtaFaculty of Dentistry, University of Ibn al-Nafis for Medical Sciences, San'a, 14034, Yemen. vini.mehta@statsense.in.
Toufiq NoorDepartment of Dental Research Cell, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, 411018, India.
Ankita MathurDepartment of Dental Research Cell, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, 411018, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between various diseases in the elderly and self-rated health (SRH) has been investigated in many prior studies. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between oral health and SRH among the geriatric Indian population. The current study used data from the Longitudinal Study of Ageing in India (LASI), conducted during 2017-2018. Our research included 31,228 individuals aged ≥ 60 in the LASI analysis. The present study used univariate and bivariate analyses, including the chi-square test, binary logistic regression, and propensity matching score to accomplish the research objectives. Nearly 88% of the elderly population were exposed to poor oral health status. One-fourth of the older people had poor SRH. The elderly with poor oral health status had a higher prevalence of SRH compared to their counterparts. Propensity score matching (PSM) also showed that the likelihood of experiencing poor SRH exceeded by 5% points among the elderly with poor oral health compared to their counterparts. Our study's results demonstrated a higher prevalence of oral morbidities among the Indian elderly. It also established a significant and robust association of poor oral health status with poor SRH.

Indexed as

Mouth DiseasesOral HealthAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth StatusHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePropensity ScoreSelf ReportAgeingIndiaOlder adultsOral healthSelf-rated health

Identifiers

PMID41006447
PMCPMC12475098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.