ArticleScientific reports2025
Improved circulating tumor DNA identification for detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by enzymatic methyl sequencing and hybrid neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early detection of multiple cancers: the era of methylation-based liquid biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detection of cancer at early stage can significantly improve the five-year survival rate of patients. Bisulfite-based methylation detection can cause DNA damage, especially in high GC content regions which was associated with the development of cancers. Loss of aberrant methylated CpG sites in cfDNA will lead to the undetectability of certain circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), consequently may affect the cancer detection. Our study uses enzymatic method to detect whole genome abnormal methylation regions in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We also provide a pretrained neural network, hybrid of BERT and CNN (BCNN), to identify ctDNA robustly. Maximum posterior probability is utilized to estimate the fraction of ESCC-derived ctDNA in plasma for predicting the risk of ESCC cancer. Our results analysis indicated that enzyme-based whole-genome methylation sequencing retained more longer cfDNA and detected more CpG sites than bisulfite-based method in both gDNA and cfDNA. Enrichment analysis of differentially methylated regions (DMR) showed that top five pathways were associated with ESCC. Compared to traditional models, our BCNN demonstrates the best performance in identifying ctDNA (AUC = 0.970). By estimating the fraction of plasma ctDNA, our BCNN exhibits high accuracy in ESCC detection even at ultralow sequencing depths (AUC = 0.946). Specifically, in the validation cohort, when the specificity is 93.75%, 7 out of 8 early-stage ESCC (TNM Stage I) were identified as positive in our preliminary results. In conclusion, our preliminary results reinforce the idea of employing BCNN as a novel strategy for ESCC early detection in clinical practice. However, to be applied in clinical, further validation with a larger sample size is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.