ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing toe joint stiffness to improve human-like walking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human metatarsophalangeal joint-often referred to as the "toe joint"-plays a vital role in gait by supporting body weight during mid-stance, enabling smooth rollover from heel to toe, and facilitating effective push-off in terminal stance. However, identifying its optimal stiffness remains challenging despite its relevance to both biological and robotic locomotion. In this study, we used a simulation-based trajectory optimization approach to investigate toe joint stiffness in a bipedal model. The results revealed that lower stiffness facilitated rollover while higher stiffness enhanced push-off. Because continuously varying stiffness is impractical in most passive devices, we extracted a single representative value (0.98 Nm/deg) by averaging the time-varying stiffness during the push-off phase. We then conducted a human walking experiment using adjustable toe joint boots across multiple stiffness conditions. The 0.98 Nm/deg condition yielded the highest subjective satisfaction and favorable spatiotemporal outcomes, especially among participants with anthropometry similar to the simulation model. Although direct numerical comparison between simulation and experiment was not performed due to modeling simplifications, key qualitative trends-such as toe joint moment progression and heel-off timing-were consistent. These findings highlight the potential of toe joint stiffness tuning to improve walking performance and user experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.