ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated differentiation of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion and prolonged febrile seizures in acute phase.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion (AESD) is the most common subtype of acute encephalopathy in Japan and is difficult to differentiate from prolonged febrile seizures (PFSs). This study aimed to explore the capability of machine learning to differentiate AESD from PFSs on the basis of early electroencephalogram (EEG) analyses. Sixty one children with AESD (n = 20) or PFS (n = 41) were included. Digital EEG data with bipolar montage collected within 48 h (1-48 h) after seizure onset were analyzed using absolute power spectrum (APS) and phase lag index (PLI) values in each EEG frequency band. The APS values in the theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands were lower for AESD than those for PFS. By contrast, the mean PLI values for all frequency bands were higher for AESD than for PFS. Machine learning analysis revealed that the APS value in the beta bands provided the highest differentiation accuracy and positive predictive value for AESD (68.8%). The mean APS values across all electrodes in the beta band may be a useful tool for differentiating between early-phase AESD and PFS. This study demonstrates the potential for early automated diagnosis of AESD and PFS using EEG analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.