ArticleScientific reports2025
An interpretable adaptive edge-weighted graph convolutional networks model for physical fitness assessment of primary school student in high-altitude regions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical fitness testing is a vital means of assessing the physical health of adolescents. However, existing assessment methods face limitations in processing complex multivariate fitness data, demonstrating poor generalizability and a lack of interpretability. To address these challenges, we propose an innovative Adaptive Edge Weight Graph Convolutional Neural Network (AWE-GCN) model. By combining dynamic graph convolutional neural networks with the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) interpretability method, this study achieves the first high-precision assessment of comprehensive physical fitness and analysis of key influencing indicators for primary school students in high-altitude regions. The model achieved macro-average F1 scores of 97.41% (male) and 96.37% (female) for 25,790 student records from Xining, Qinghai, China (average altitude: 3,137 m). The SHAP analysis identified the 50-meter sprint, 1-minute sit-ups, and the 50-meter × 8 shuttles run as core indicators influencing primary school students' physical fitness. It further elucidated the corresponding physiological mechanisms from the perspective of sensitive periods in physical development and high-altitude hypoxia adaptation. Furthermore, comparative experiments against four baseline models, including SVM, CatBoost, MLP and CNN, clearly demonstrate that the AWE-GCN model achieves the best performance across all key evaluation metrics, such as Precision, Recall, and F1-Score. The ablation study confirms that SMOTE provides a balanced data foundation, upon which the adaptive edge weighting module maximizes physical fitness classification performance, representing the model's key capability to dynamically capture the complex relationships among physiological indicators. By integrating deep learning with interpretability analysis, this study provides a high-precision framework for adolescent physical fitness assessment, with scientific significance for optimizing physical education curriculum design and formulating health policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.