ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Automatic Body Region Classification in CT Scans Using Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate classification of anatomical regions in computed tomography (CT) scans is essential for optimizing downstream diagnostic and analytic workflows in medical imaging. We demonstrate the high performance that deep learning (DL) algorithms can achieve in the classification of whole-body parts in CT images acquired under various protocols. Our model was trained using a dataset consisting of 5485 anonymized neuroimaging informatics technology initiative (NIFTI) CT scans collected from 45 different health centers. The dataset was split into 3290 scans for training, 1097 scans for validation, and 1098 scans for testing. Each body CT scan was classified into six distinct classes covering the whole body: chest, abdomen, pelvis, chest and abdomen, abdomen and pelvis, and chest and abdomen and pelvis. The performance of the DL model stood at an accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of 97.53% (95% CI: 96.62%, 98.45%), 97.56% (95% CI: 96.6%, 98.4%), 97.6% (95% CI: 96.7%, 98.5%), and 97.56% (96.6%, 98.4%), respectively, in identifying different body parts. These findings demonstrate the strength of our approach in annotating CT images through a wide variation in both acquisition protocols and patient demographics. This study underlines the potential that DL holds for medical imaging and, in particular, for the automation of body region classification in CT. Our findings confirm that these models could be implemented in clinical routines to improve diagnostic efficiency and harmony.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.