Evidence mapPaperPMID 41007027Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Preterm Infants Without Neurological Damage and Nursery Care: Risks, Benefits and Prospects for Intervention.

Micaela Capobianco

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Micaela CapobiancoEconomic, Psychological and Communication Sciences Department, Niccolò Cusano University, 00166 Rome, Italy.

Funding

Università Unicusano Economic, Psychological and Communication Sciences Department, Niccolo` Cusano University, Rome, Italy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesPreterm infants without neurological damage are at greater risk of developing specific difficulties due to the unpredictable effects of the interaction between biological immaturity and characteristics of physical and social environment. This paper discusses the potential advantages and limitations of placing premature infants in daycare in the first three years.

methodsIn light of the scientific literature, the article discuss-es the topic through a critical comparison of studies on the developmental outcomes of preterm infants, on the characteristics of nurseries and on the role of educators.

resultsNursery placement must be evaluated in an integrated and multifactorial perspective, taking into account the specific vulnerabilities of each individual preterm child and the characteristics of the nursery. The role of educators is to structure a quality educational environment that meets the specific needs of each individual preterm child, in close collaboration with parents and specialists.

conclusionThis article provides suggestions to parents, educators, and specialists for the assessment and intervention with preterm children without neurological impairment in the educational setting, with a multidisciplinary view to prevention and early intervention.

Indexed as

multifactorial developmental modelnurserypreterms without neurological damagepreventionspecific disorders

Identifiers

PMID41007027
PMCPMC12468911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.