Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007159›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Comprehensive Survey of OCT-Based Disorders Diagnosis: From Feature Extraction Methods to Robust Security Frameworks.

Alex Liew, Sos Agaian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex LiewGraduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7643-2235
Sos AgaianCollege of Staten Island, City University of New York, New York, NY 10314, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a leading imaging technique for diagnosing retinal disorders such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. Its ability to detect structural changes, especially in the optic nerve head, has made it vital for early diagnosis and monitoring. This paper surveys techniques for ocular disease prediction using OCT, focusing on both hand-crafted and deep learning-based feature extractors. While the field has seen rapid growth, a detailed comparative analysis of these methods has been lacking. We address this by reviewing research from the past 20 years, evaluating methods based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and computational cost. Key diseases examined include glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, cataracts, amblyopia, and macular degeneration. We also assess public OCT datasets widely used in model development. A unique contribution of this paper is the exploration of adversarial attacks targeting OCT-based diagnostic systems and the vulnerabilities of different feature extraction techniques. We propose a practical, robust defense strategy that integrates with existing models and outperforms current solutions. Our findings emphasize the value of combining classical and deep learning methods with strong defenses to enhance the security and reliability of OCT-based diagnostics, and we offer guidance for future research and clinical integration.

Indexed as

adversarial attacksclinical decision support systemsdeep learning modelsdiabetic retinopathyglaucoma detectionhand-crafted featuresoptical coherence tomography (OCT)robustness in medical imagingsecurity in AI model

Identifiers

PMID41007159
PMCPMC12467681

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.