ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comprehensive Survey of OCT-Based Disorders Diagnosis: From Feature Extraction Methods to Robust Security Frameworks.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal Deep Learning and Knowledge-Enhanced Intelligent Decision Support System for Pipeline Embolization Device Size Selection in Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a leading imaging technique for diagnosing retinal disorders such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. Its ability to detect structural changes, especially in the optic nerve head, has made it vital for early diagnosis and monitoring. This paper surveys techniques for ocular disease prediction using OCT, focusing on both hand-crafted and deep learning-based feature extractors. While the field has seen rapid growth, a detailed comparative analysis of these methods has been lacking. We address this by reviewing research from the past 20 years, evaluating methods based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and computational cost. Key diseases examined include glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, cataracts, amblyopia, and macular degeneration. We also assess public OCT datasets widely used in model development. A unique contribution of this paper is the exploration of adversarial attacks targeting OCT-based diagnostic systems and the vulnerabilities of different feature extraction techniques. We propose a practical, robust defense strategy that integrates with existing models and outperforms current solutions. Our findings emphasize the value of combining classical and deep learning methods with strong defenses to enhance the security and reliability of OCT-based diagnostics, and we offer guidance for future research and clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.