ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
In Vivo Targeted Reprogramming of Cardiac Fibroblasts for Heart Regeneration: Advances and Therapeutic Potential.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting Cardiac Fibroblast Plasticity for Antifibrotic and Regenerative Therapy in Heart Failure.Cells · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine for Cardiac Repair in Heart Failure: From Targeted Delivery to Regenerative Modulation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial infarction-induced cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Excessive post-infarct fibrosis contributes to adverse cardiac remodeling and the progression to heart failure. In vivo reprogramming strategies offer a promising avenue for heart regeneration by directly converting resident fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes through enforced expression of cardiogenic genes. This approach circumvents the need for invasive biopsies, cell expansion, induction of pluripotency, or autologous transplantation. Despite these advantages, key challenges persist, including low reprogramming efficiency and limited cellular targeting specificity. A critical factor for effective anti-fibrotic therapy is the precise and efficient delivery of reprogramming effectors specifically to fibrotic fibroblasts, while minimizing off-target effects on non-fibroblast cardiac cells and fibroblasts in non-cardiac tissues. In this review, we discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying in vivo cardiac reprogramming, with a focus on fibroblast heterogeneity, key transcriptional drivers, and relevant intercellular interactions. We also examine current advances in fibroblast-specific delivery systems employing both viral and non-viral vectors for the administration of lineage-reprogramming factors such as cDNA overexpressions or microRNAs. Finally, we underscore innovative strategies that hold promise for enhancing the precision and efficacy of cellular reprogramming, ultimately fostering translational development and paving the way for rigorous preclinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.