ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Eye Tracking-Enhanced Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review on Data Efficiency, Interpretability, and Multimodal Integration.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Critical Care Nursing Practice: A Scoping Review.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- On the Use and Application of Virtual Reality in Diagnostic Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- [Visual prior-guided masked image modeling enhances chest X-ray diagnostic efficacy].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning outperforms clinical and brain region models in predicting stroke-associated pneumonia: an explainable AI study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- AI Images vs. Real Photographs: Investigating Visual Recognition and Perception.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) has revolutionized medical image analysis (MIA), enabling early anomaly detection, precise lesion segmentation, and automated disease classification. However, its clinical integration faces two major challenges: reliance on limited, narrowly annotated datasets that inadequately capture real-world patient diversity, and the inherent "black-box" nature of DL decision-making, which complicates physician scrutiny and accountability. Eye tracking (ET) technology offers a transformative solution by capturing radiologists' gaze patterns to generate supervisory signals. These signals enhance DL models through two key mechanisms: providing weak supervision to improve feature recognition and diagnostic accuracy, particularly when labeled data are scarce, and enabling direct comparison between machine and human attention to bridge interpretability gaps and build clinician trust. This approach also extends effectively to multimodal learning models (MLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs), supporting the alignment of machine reasoning with clinical expertise by grounding visual observations in diagnostic context, refining attention mechanisms, and validating complex decision pathways. Conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024569630), this review synthesizes state-of-the-art strategies for ET-DL integration. We further propose a unified framework in which ET innovatively serves as a data efficiency optimizer, a model interpretability validator, and a multimodal alignment supervisor. This framework paves the way for clinician-centered AI systems that prioritize verifiable reasoning, seamless workflow integration, and intelligible performance, thereby addressing key implementation barriers and outlining a path for future clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.