ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Integration of EHR and ECG Data for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke Patients.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is challenging due to its transient nature. Existing methods often rely solely on electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms or Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based clinical risk factors. We hypothesized that explicitly balancing the contributions of these heterogeneous data sources could improve prediction accuracy. We developed a Transformer-based deep learning model that integrates 12-lead ECG signals and 47 structured EHR variables from 189 patients with cryptogenic stroke, including 49 with PAF. By systematically varying the relative contributions of ECG and EHR data, we identified an optimal ratio for prediction. Best performance (accuracy: 0.70, sensitivity: 0.72, specificity: 0.87, Area Under Curve - Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC): 0.65, Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC): 0.43) was achieved using a 5-fold cross-validation when EHR data contributed one-third and ECG data two-thirds of the model's input. This multimodal approach outperformed unimodal models, improving accuracy by 35% over EHR-only and 5% over ECG-only methods. Our results support the value of combining ECG and structured EHR information to improve accuracy and sensitivity in this pilot cohort, motivating validation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.