Evidence mapPaperPMID 41007212Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care.

Rahul Kumar, Conor Dougherty, Kyle Sporn, Akshay Khanna, Puja Ravi, Pranay Prabhakar, Nasif Zaman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07733752 (When AI Is the First Clinician), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07733752 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

When AI Is the First Clinician: Impact of Pre-Visit AI Use on Presentation, Diagnostic Expectations, and Shared Decision-Making in Spine Physical Therapy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsLow Back Pain, Neck Pain, RadiculopathyArmsre-visit AI symptom-checker use
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rahul KumarDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-2895
Conor DoughertySidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Kyle SpornNorton College of Medicine, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-5707-9009
Akshay KhannaSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-4384-2693
Puja RaviDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, 500 S State St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Pranay PrabhakarAlbany Medical College, 43 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1374-1900
Nasif ZamanHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada Reno, 1664 N. Virginia St. LME 314, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0120-0939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies has initiated a paradigm shift in contemporary spine care. This narrative review synthesizes advances across imaging-based diagnostics, surgical planning, genomic risk stratification, and post-operative outcome prediction. We critically assess high-performing AI tools, such as convolutional neural networks for vertebral fracture detection, robotic guidance platforms like Mazor X and ExcelsiusGPS, and deep learning-based morphometric analysis systems. In parallel, we examine the emergence of ambient clinical intelligence and precision pharmacogenomics as enablers of personalized spine care. Notably, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and polygenic risk scores are enabling a shift from reactive to predictive management models in spine surgery. We also highlight multi-omics platforms and federated learning frameworks that support integrative, privacy-preserving analytics at scale. Despite these advances, challenges remain-including algorithmic opacity, regulatory fragmentation, data heterogeneity, and limited generalizability across populations and clinical settings. Through a multidimensional lens, this review outlines not only current capabilities but also future directions to ensure safe, equitable, and high-fidelity AI deployment in spine care delivery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomedical informaticsclinical decision supportcomputer visionmachine learningmusculoskeletal imagingneural networksoutcome predictionprecision medicinepredictive modelingspinal diagnosticsspine surgerysurgical robotics

Identifiers

PMID41007212
PMCPMC12466956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.