ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dementia and Heart Failure Classification Using Optimized Weighted Objective Distance and Blood Biomarker-Based Features.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dementia and heart failure are growing global health issues, exacerbated by aging populations and disparities in care access. Diagnosing these conditions often requires advanced equipment or tests with limited availability. A reliable tool distinguishing between the two conditions is essential, enabling more accurate diagnoses and reducing misclassifications and inappropriate referrals. This study proposes a novel measurement, the optimized weighted objective distance (OWOD), a modified version of the weighted objective distance, for the classification of dementia and heart failure. The OWOD is designed to enhance model generalization through a data-driven approach. By enhancing objective class generalization, applying multi-feature distance normalization, and identifying the most significant features for classification-together with newly integrated blood biomarker features-the OWOD could strengthen the classification of dementia and heart failure. A combination of risk factors and proposed blood biomarkers (derived from 10,000 electronic health records at Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai, Thailand), comprising 20 features, demonstrated the best OWOD classification performance. For model evaluation, the proposed OWOD-based classification method attained an accuracy of 95.45%, a precision of 96.14%, a recall of 94.70%, an F1-score of 95.42%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 97.10%, surpassing the results obtained using other machine learning-based classification models (gradient boosting, decision tree, neural network, and support vector machine).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.