ReviewBiology2025
Therapeutic Potential of Natural Compounds for Brain Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal trends in post-cardiac arrest brain injury research: a bibliometric analysis of evolving priorities and translation gaps.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Neurochemical Mechanisms Underlying Tanshinone-Mediated Neuroprotection and Formulation Strategies in Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.Neurochemical research · 2026Review
- Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Stroke: A Narrative Review Focusing on Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Astragaloside IV suppresses neuroinflammation via PI3K/Akt/NF-κB to ameliorate cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury based on network pharmacology analysis and experimental validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Neuroprotective effects of curcumin, memantine, and caffeic acid in a Rat model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Effect ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, commonly occurring in ischemic stroke and post-cardiac arrest scenarios, results in complex secondary damage involving oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown. Despite decades of research, no pharmacological agent has yet been clinically approved for post-I/R neuroprotection. Natural compounds have recently gained attention for their multimodal therapeutic potential, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and neuroregenerative effects. This review highlights nine promising candidates-resveratrol, curcumin, quercetin, berberine, ginkgolide B, baicalin, naringin, fucoidan, and astaxanthin-that exhibit efficacy in experimental models of I/R injury when administered after the insult. Their chemical structures, pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms of action are described in detail, focusing on key signaling pathways such as nuclear factor erythroid 2-related (Nrf2), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.