ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Access to Food Establishments via Meal Delivery Applications: A Study of University and Non-University Settings in a Brazilian Metropolis.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Socioeconomic Disparities in Adults' Interactions with the Digital Food Environment: A Qualitative Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize access to food establishments through a meal delivery application in university and non-university settings within a Brazilian metropolis. This cross-sectional study used data from a leading meal delivery platform. All establishments delivering to four public and four private university campuses in Belo Horizonte, Brazil were identified. For comparison, one corresponding non-university location was selected for each campus (yielding eight campus-location pairs). Each location corresponds to a central address within the paired neighborhood that was entered into the app to simulate delivery availability. Pairing criteria were based on geographic region and income levels. Information on establishment categories (classified by keywords), delivery distances, delivery fees, and geographic centrality was collected and analyzed descriptively. The number of available establishments ranged from 7176 to 11,440 across the assessed locations. Most establishments were categorized under keywords referring to snacks (e.g., burgers, savory snacks, pizza), regardless of location. Delivery distances ranged from 0 to 19.6 km, with shorter distances observed for university addresses and corresponding locations situated in central neighborhoods of the city, and longer distances for peripheral areas. Only 4.7% of establishments offered free delivery, and higher delivery fees were more frequent in non-university locations. No significant differences were observed between public and private universities. Food establishments are widely accessible via the app; however, central areas tend to have broader service coverage. Regardless of whether the location is a university or non-university setting, or whether it is central or peripheral, there is a predominance of establishments classified under keywords associated with unhealthy food options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.