Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007647›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Cardiac Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury: Pathophysiology, Therapeutic Targets and Future Interventions.

Lujain Alsadder, Abdulaziz Hamadah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Stem cells in organogenesis and regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. A cost-effective proof-of-conceptFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lujain AlsadderFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3019-9754
Abdulaziz HamadahFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in the medical field, particularly in cardiovascular diseases, have significantly improved the diagnosis, management, and prevention of life-threatening presentations and comorbidities. Despite this progress, cardiovascular diseases continue to place a substantial burden on healthcare systems, contributing to nearly 32% of all global deaths according to the World Health Organisation. A predominant complication arising from the treatment of cardiovascular diseases is cardiac ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, which occurs when blood supply is restored to the myocardium following a period of ischaemia, paradoxically resulting in further tissue damage. There are multiple factors involved in complex pathophysiology and complicated clinical outcomes. Although various therapeutic strategies have been explored to mitigate this injury, an optimal solution has yet to be identified. Therapeutic approaches such as pharmacological interventions and molecular therapy have shown promising prospects in this field. Ongoing research aims to address this unresolved issue, which continues to pose significant challenges for both patients and healthcare professionals. This review aims to explore the multitude of underlying mechanisms of ischaemia-reperfusion injury, and identify current knowledge gaps and new emerging therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseischaemia–reperfusion injurypathophysiology

Identifiers

PMID41007647
PMCPMC12467651

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.