Evidence mapPaperPMID 41007681Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Neuromodulation in Neurodegenerative Disease: Precision in Chaos, Learning in Loss.

Andrea Calderone, Desirèe Latella, Elvira La Fauci, Roberta Puleo, Arturo Sergi, Mariachiara De Francesco, Maria Mauro, Angela Foti, Leda Salemi, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea CalderoneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-5012-4425
Desirèe LatellaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1812-8454
Elvira La FauciDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Roberta PuleoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Arturo SergiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Mariachiara De FrancescoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Maria MauroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Angela FotiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Leda SalemiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Rocco Salvatore CalabròIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8566-3166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and multiple sclerosis (MS) are marked by progressive network dysfunction that challenges conventional, protocol-based neurorehabilitation. In parallel, neuromodulation, encompassing deep brain stimulation (DBS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and artificial intelligence (AI), has matured rapidly, offering complementary levers to tailor therapy in real time. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence at the intersection of AI and neuromodulation in neurorehabilitation, focusing on how data-driven models can personalize stimulation and improve functional outcomes. We conducted a targeted literature synthesis of peer-reviewed studies identified via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and reference chaining, prioritizing recent clinical and translational reports on adaptive/closed-loop systems, predictive modeling, and biomarker-guided protocols. Across indications, convergent findings show that AI can optimize device programming, enable state-dependent stimulation, and support clinician decision-making through multimodal biomarkers derived from neural, kinematic, and behavioral signals. Key barriers include data quality and interoperability, model interpretability and safety, and ethical and regulatory oversight. Here we argue that AI-enhanced neuromodulation reframes neurorehabilitation from static dosing to adaptive, patient-specific care. Advancing this paradigm will require rigorous external validation, standardized reporting of control policies and artifacts, clinician-in-the-loop governance, and privacy-preserving analytics.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseartificial intelligencedeep brain stimulationmultiple sclerosisneurodegenerative diseasesneuromodulationParkinson’s diseasetranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41007681
PMCPMC12467075

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.