ReviewBiomedicines2025
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Dietary Interventions in Non-Hodgkin B-Cell Lymphomas: Implications for Treatment Response.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gut Microbiota in Hematologic Malignancies: Mechanisms, Clinical Associations, and Translational Opportunities.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Cecal Involvement of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Rare Extra-Nodal Presentation.Journal of medical cases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of lymphoid malignancies with variable biological behavior, clinical presentation and treatment response. While chemoimmunotherapy remains the cornerstone of their management, growing evidence implicates the gut microbiota as a critical modulator of both lymphomagenesis and therapeutic efficacy. Gut microbiota dysbiosis, characterized by reduced microbial diversity and pathogenic taxonomic shifts, has been observed also in newly diagnosed patients and not just after therapy. This microbial imbalance contributes to mucosal barrier disruption, systemic inflammation, and altered immune responses, affecting treatment outcomes and toxicity profiles. Antibiotic exposure, especially broad-spectrum agents, exacerbates dysbiosis and has been associated with inferior responses to immunochemotherapy and CAR T-cell therapy. Conversely, certain commensal taxa, like Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Lactobacillus johnsonii, may exert protective effects by preserving mucosal homeostasis and promoting antitumor immunity. Targeted interventions, including prudent antibiotic stewardship, prebiotics, probiotics, dietary modulation, and fecal microbiota transplantation, are under investigation to restore eubiosis and improve clinical outcomes. Preliminary clinical trials suggest a strong correlation between baseline microbiome composition and therapeutic response. Further mechanistic studies and randomized trials are warranted to define the causal role of the microbiome in non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas pathophysiology and to develop personalized microbiome-modulating strategies as adjuncts to standard treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.