ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
The Prevalence of Tail Alterations on German Dairy Farms.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for Tail Alterations on German Dairy Farms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine herd prevalence of tail alterations (deviated and shortened tails) on farms in Germany. In total, 86,355 cows on 765 dairy farms in three regions (North, South, East) were assessed for presence or absence of deviated and shortened tails. Mean herd prevalence of deviated tails was 10.00% with a median of 7.89%. The mean herd prevalence of shortened tails was 1.07% with a median of 0%. Herd size, energy-corrected milk yield (ECM), and husbandry system were associated with herd prevalence rates of tail deviations and shortened tails. Herd prevalence increased with herd size (Spearman's ρ = 0.586) and median ECM (ρ = 0.404). 28.10% farms had a herd prevalence <5% tail alterations, while 26.41% had a herd prevalence of >15%. Our findings plead for including monitoring of tail alterations in animal welfare assessments of dairy farms. The National Dairy FARM Program in New Zealand aims to achieve a herd prevalence of less than 5%. A herd prevalence of >15% tail alterations is regarded as the critical threshold requiring clarification and elimination of causes. It is imperative that all dairy farms strive to achieve a herd prevalence of less than 5% and welfare protocols are duly adjusted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.