Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007987›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Speculative Review on the Feasibility of Porcine Circovirus 2 Elimination.

Joaquim Segalés, Marina Sibila

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joaquim SegalésDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1539-7261
Marina SibilaUnitat Mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3867-1988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) is still infecting pigs after almost 20 years of massive vaccination all over the world. Vaccines are highly effective at counteracting the clinical signs of systemic disease caused by PCV2 and can significantly reduce the number of subclinically infected pigs. However, current vaccination programs based on one single dose in piglets are insufficient to prevent infection in a proportion of animals. Moreover, systematic vaccination of the herd changes viral epidemiology and, consequently, can cause modifications in infection timing. Such a scenario may prompt intrauterine and piglet early infections, thus facilitating viral circulation even before vaccination takes place. Considering the demonstrated high vaccine efficacy, it would be legitimate to explore the possibility of eliminating PCV2 from swine herds, but only one attempt to eliminate the virus from a herd has been published so far. The present speculative review evaluates the existing scientific literature regarding the feasibility of getting rid of this virus under commercial farm conditions. The use of PCV2 vaccination in all swine populations within a herd and the implementation of regional or national control programs are foreseen as compulsory for the eventual successful elimination of this endemic viral infection.

Indexed as

eliminationeradicationporcine circovirus 2 (PCV2)vaccinewhole-herd vaccination

Identifiers

PMID41007987
PMCPMC12466544

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.