ReviewBrain sciences2025
Navigating the Complexity of Bilingual Aphasia: Current Insights and Future Directions.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Models for Bilingual Aphasia: A Systematic Review of Language Deficit Research with a Focus on Code-Switching and Translation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reported symptoms and patterns of language impairment in bilingual speakers with primary progressive aphasia: a retrospective study.Aphasiology · 2026Article
- Broca's biases in modern aphasiology.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Evoked potentials in stroke rehabilitation: current applications, emerging technologies, and future directions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bilingual aphasia is shaped by a dynamic interplay of neural, cognitive, linguistic, and experiential factors that influence both impairment and recovery. This review synthesizes current evidence on bilingual language organization, assessment, and treatment, emphasizing how individual language histories and cognitive systems contribute to variability in outcomes. We highlight the challenges of estimating pre-stroke proficiency, evaluating impairment across languages, and interpreting recovery patterns. Finally, we explore emerging technological directions while emphasizing that advances in machine learning, automated assessment, and neurotechnology must be developed with explicit attention to cultural responsiveness and equity to ensure benefits reach diverse multilingual populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.