ArticleBrain sciences2025
Potential Predictors of Mortality in Adults with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal changes in coagulation-fibrinolysis in patients with traumatic brain injury within seven days after injury.iScience · 2026Article
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSevere traumatic brain injury (sTBI) in adults remains a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Early identification of reliable predictors of outcome is crucial for risk stratification and ICU management. Disturbances of hemostasis and metabolic factors such as body mass index (BMI) have been proposed as potential prognostic markers, but evidence remains limited.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including 307 adult patients with sTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) admitted to three tertiary intensive care units in Ukraine between September 2023 and July 2024. All patients underwent surgical evacuation of hematomas and decompressive craniotomy. Laboratory parameters (APTT, INR, fibrinogen, platelets, D-dimer) were collected within 12 h of admission. BMI was calculated from measured height and weight. Predictive modeling was performed using L1-regularized logistic regression and Random Forest algorithms. Class imbalance was addressed with SMOTE. Model performance was assessed by AUC, accuracy, calibration, and feature importance.
resultsThe 28-day all-cause mortality was 32.9%. Compared with survivors, non-survivors had significantly lower GCS scores and higher INR, D-dimer, and APTT values. Very high VIF values indicated severe multicollinearity between predictors. Classical logistic regression was not estimable due to perfect separation; therefore, regularized logistic regression and Random Forest were applied. Random Forest demonstrated higher performance (AUC 0.95, accuracy ≈ 90%) than logistic regression (AUC 0.77, accuracy 70.1%), although results must be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size and potential overfitting. Feature importance analysis identified increased BMI, prolonged APTT, and elevated D-dimer as leading predictors of mortality. Sensitivity analysis excluding BMI still yielded strong performance (AUC 0.91), confirming the prognostic value of coagulation markers and GCS.
conclusionsMortality in adult sTBI patients was strongly associated with impaired hemostasis, obesity, and low neurological status at admission. Machine learning-based modeling demonstrated promising predictive accuracy but is exploratory in nature. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to retrospective design, severe multicollinearity, potential overfitting, and absence of external validation. Larger, prospective, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results and improve early risk stratification in severe TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.