ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effectiveness of the Research Practice Ability Enhancement Program on Evidence-Based Practice Competencies in Clinical Nurses: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Facilitators and barriers to innovation and research capacity among clinical nurses: A qualitative systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesEvidence-based practice (EBP) remains limited among clinical nurses worldwide, with Korean healthcare settings facing challenges. This study examined the effectiveness of the research practice ability enhancement program (RPAEP) in strengthening evidence-based practice (EBP) competencies among clinical nurses who had completed master's coursework without a thesis.
methodsA non-randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Korea (June-December 2022). Thirty participants were assigned by convenience sampling to intervention (n = 15) or control (n = 15) groups. The intervention comprised 12 biweekly sessions. The primary outcome was research practice ability (RPA); the secondary outcomes were EBP beliefs (EBPBs), EBP Attitudes (EBPAs), and Nursing Professional Values (NPVs). Analyses employed Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests. The qualitative evaluation used thematic analysis of focus group interviews (FGIs) (n = 12).
resultsAll participants completed the study. The intervention group showed significant improvements in RPA (within-group: Z = -1.96,
conclusionsThe RPAEP enhanced nurses' EBP competencies despite the non-randomized design. However, single-site implementation and convenience sampling limit generalizability. Sustained EBP integration requires addressing individual and organizational barriers through comprehensive education with institutional commitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.