ReviewBiomolecules2025
Population-Level Dynamics and Community-Mediated Resistance to Antimicrobial Peptides.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles: Research Advances from Biogenesis Mechanisms to Engineered Applications.Membranes · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial peptide resistance in Salmonella AMR: the role of surface binding and lipopolysaccharide remodelling: one health implications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are crucial components of innate immunity and promising leads for new anti-infective therapies, prized for their broad-spectrum activity and membrane-disruptive mechanisms. However, traditional models of antimicrobial action and resistance often focus on single-cell responses or genetically encoded resistance, overlooking the complex collective behaviors of bacteria at the population level. A growing body of evidence indicates that bacterial communities can profoundly influence AMP efficacy through emergent, community-level resistance mechanisms. In this review, we examine how population-level dynamics and interactions enable bacteria to withstand AMPs beyond what is predicted by cell-autonomous models. We first describe the mechanisms of peptide sequestration by bacterial debris, dead cells, outer membrane vesicles, and biofilm matrix polymers, which diminish the concentration of active peptide available to kill neighboring cells. We then analyze how population-level traits-including inoculum effects, phenotypic heterogeneity, and persister subpopulations-shape survival outcomes and promote regrowth after treatment. Cooperative processes such as protease secretion further enhance communal defenses by coordinating or amplifying protective responses. Beyond cataloging these mechanisms, we highlight recent advances in microfluidic tools, single-cell imaging, and biophysical modeling that reveal the spatial and temporal dynamics of AMP action in structured populations. Collectively, these insights show how bacterial communities absorb, neutralize, or delay AMP activity without genetic resistance, with important implications for therapeutic design and the evaluation of AMP efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.