Evidence mapPaperPMID 41008897Full record

ArticleCancers2025

A Preliminary Study on Deep Learning-Based Plan Quality Prediction in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases.

Runyu Jiang, Yuan Shao, Yingzi Liu, Chih-Wei Chang, Aubrey Zhang, Malvern Madondo, Mohammadamin Moradi, Aranee Sivananthan, Mark C Korpics, Xiaofeng Yang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Runyu JiangDepartment of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Yuan ShaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Yingzi LiuDepartment of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Chih-Wei ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Aubrey ZhangDepartment of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Malvern MadondoDepartment of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Mohammadamin MoradiDepartment of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Aranee SivananthanDepartment of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Mark C KorpicsDepartment of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8449-2986
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9023-5855
Zhen TianDepartment of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Funding

Real-time Volumetric Imaging for Motion Management and Dose Delivery VerificationR01CA272991 · EMORY UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$511k
Artificial Intelligence Driven Automatic Treatment Planning of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Multiple Brain MetastasesR37CA272755 · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · 2025 to 2025
$358k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272991NCI NIH HHS R37 CA272755NIH HHS 1R01CA272991-03NIH HHS 1R37CA272755-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesGK plan quality is strongly affected by lesion size and shape, and the same evaluation metrics may not be directly comparable across patients with different anatomies. This study proposes a deep learning-based method to predict achievable, clinically acceptable plan quality from patient-specific geometry.

methodsA hierarchically densely connected U-Net (HD-U-Net) was trained at the lesion level to predict 3D dose distributions for the estimation of plan quality metrics, including coverage, selectivity, gradient index (GI), and conformity index at a 50% prescription dose (CI50). To improve the prediction accuracy of plan quality metrics, Dice similarity coefficient losses for the 100% and 50% isodose lines were incorporated with conventional mean squared error (MSE) loss.

resultsTen-fold cross-validation on 463 brain metastases (BMs) from 175 patients showed that our method achieved smaller mean absolute errors across all four metrics than the HD-U-Net baseline trained with MSE loss. Improvements were pronounced in all metrics for small metastases, and were observed primarily in GI and CI50 for medium and large lesions. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed the statistical significance of these improvements (

conclusionsThe proposed method outperformed the baseline model in capturing overall trends, improving per-lesion accuracy, and enhancing robustness to dataset variability. It can serve as a pre-planning tool to guide planners in constraint setting and priority tuning, a post-planning quality control tool to identify subpar plans that could be substantially improved, and as a foundation for developing deep reinforcement learning-based automated planning of GK treatments for brain metastases.

Indexed as

brain metastasesdeep learningGamma Knife radiosurgeryHD-U-Netplan quality prediction

Identifiers

PMID41008897
PMCPMC12468628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.