SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Assessing Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Immune Phenotype-Guided Immunomodulatory Strategies and Intensive Care Outcomes in Septic Shock: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Observational
- Hemodynamic Effect of IgM-Enriched Immunoglobulin in the Early Stage ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Modes of (Inter)Actions of Polyvalent Immunoglobulins: Nonclinical and Clinical Research in Severe Bacterial Infections.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Adjuvant intravenous immunoglobulin in elderly sepsis: a randomized controlled study of mortality, organ function, and inflammation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-omics deciphers sepsis immune dysregulation: a dual-pathway targeted small-molecule therapy improves survival and ameliorates multi-organ dysfunction.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review critically evaluates the efficacy and safety of monoclonal (mAb) and polyclonal (pAb) antibody therapies in adult sepsis and septic shock by synthesizing data from 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing over 10,000 patients. Sepsis and septic shock continue to be major critical-care mortality causes worldwide because of simultaneous hyperinflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. The clinical results from using targeted antibody therapies to manage this dysregulated response have shown inconsistent results. We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (through February 2025) to identify RCTs that compared mAb and pAb treatments to placebo or standard care in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. Monoclonal antibodies against single cytokines e.g., Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and endotoxin, did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality in unselected cohorts, though subgroup analyses of patients with elevated Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or early septic shock showed trends toward benefit. Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) enriched for Immunoglobulin M (IgM) demonstrated the most consistent mortality reduction when administered early in hyperinflammatory phases. Emerging precision strategies-including checkpoint inhibitors targeting Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 inhibitors (anti-PD-1/PD-L1), complement component 5a inhibitors (anti-C5a), and anti-adrenomedullin-were safe and improved organ-support-free days and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. According to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, evidence showed moderate confidence for mortality, high certainty for safety and low to moderate certainty for secondary outcomes. The use of broad single-target monoclonal treatments has failed to deliver significant improvements in sepsis patient outcomes. The most promising approaches for sepsis treatment involve biomarker-guided precision strategies and polyclonal IgM-enriched IVIG. Future sepsis trials need to implement rapid immune profiling and adaptive designs and combination regimens to achieve optimal efficacy and establish personalized guideline-based sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.