Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41009437›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

The Future of Fascia-A Scoping Review on Emerging Research Trends and Recommended Sample Sizes and Effect Sizes in Fascia Studies.

Grzegorz Zieliński

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Exploring fascia in myofascial pain syndrome: an integrative model of mechanisms.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Grzegorz ZielińskiDepartment of Sports Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2849-0641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify future research trends in fascia-related investigations, as well as to develop new effect size thresholds for between-group differences, along with sample size calculations and statistical power estimations specific to fascial research. For the purposes of this study, the following databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two studies were included in the scoping review, and 31 meta-analyses were identified and used to calculate effect sizes and sample sizes. Future research on fascia will likely focus on its role in movement organisation and chronic pain, particularly in older adults. The advancement of modern imaging techniques and the integration of therapeutic approaches, such as manual therapy and movement-based interventions, may significantly impact the diagnosis and treatment of fascial dysfunctions. In future studies on fascia, effect sizes (Cohen's

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFasciaHumansSample Sizeeffect sizesfasciafuturesample sizes

Identifiers

PMID41009437
PMCPMC12470057

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.