ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
The Interplay Between Therapeutic Self-Amplifying RNA and the Innate Immune System: Balancing Efficiency and Reactogenicity.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive analysis of the use of nucleoside analogues in RNA therapeutics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- RNA Therapeutics in Viral Infections and Cancer: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Prospects: A Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- mRNA-Encoded Antibodies: An Emerging Paradigm in Antiviral Protection.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- RNA-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma: From Molecular Targets to Delivery and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Circular RNA therapeutics: a new class of long-acting RNA medicines for oncology, immunology, and rare diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) is a promising platform for the production of vaccines, anti-tumor therapeutics, and gene therapy solutions. One of the advantages of the saRNA platform is the ability to use small doses of the therapeutic while maintaining prolonged expression of the target protein. However, the presence of auxiliary sequences encoding non-structural alphavirus proteins, which facilitate the replication of saRNA in cells, necessitates a thorough assessment of the biosafety of this platform. In our review, we focus on saRNA functions in the context of its interaction with the innate immune system. Firstly, an analysis is conducted of the side effects of candidate saRNA therapeutics, as observed in preclinical and clinical trials. Then, the mechanisms underlying the function of saRNA products derived from various alphavirus genomes in cell systems are discussed, as well as the reasons for their reactogenicity. The key approaches to optimizing the saRNA platform, which are aimed at reducing the activation of the innate immune response and cytopathic effects, are described. To summarize, this review enables us to systematize our knowledge on the advantages and disadvantages of saRNA, as well as potential approaches to improving this platform in order to develop more effective and safer therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.