Evidence mapPaperPMID 41009567Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Piezo1 and Piezo2 Ion Channels in Neuronal and Astrocytic Responses to MEA Implants in the Rat Somatosensory Cortex.

Pegah Haghighi, Thomas J Smith, Ghazaal Tahmasebi, Sophia Vargas, Madison S Jiang, Ajaree C Massaquoi, Johnathan Huff, Jeffrey R Capadona, Joseph J Pancrazio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pegah HaghighiDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-1427-2129
Thomas J SmithSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Ghazaal TahmasebiDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6430-0836
Sophia VargasDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-4439-1291
Madison S JiangSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-1653-0072
Ajaree C MassaquoiSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Johnathan HuffDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Jeffrey R CapadonaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-6947
Joseph J PancrazioDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8276-3690

Funding

NIH HHS 1R01NS110823-06NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) are tools for recording and stimulating neural activity, with potential applications in prosthetic control and treatment of neurological disorders. However, when chronically implanted, the long-term functionality of MEAs is hindered by the foreign body response (FBR), characterized by gliosis, neuronal loss, and the formation of a glial scar encapsulating layer. This response begins immediately after implantation and is exacerbated by factors such as brain micromotion and the mechanical mismatch between stiff electrodes and soft brain tissue, leading to signal degradation. Despite progress in mitigating these issues, the underlying mechanisms of the brain's response to MEA implantation remain unclear, particularly regarding how cells sense and respond to the associated mechanical forces. Mechanosensitive ion channels, such as the Piezo family, are key mediators of cellular responses to mechanical stimuli. In this study, silicon-based NeuroNexus MEAs consisting of four shanks were implanted in the rat somatosensory cortex for sixteen weeks. Weekly neural recordings were conducted to assess signal quality over time, revealing a decline in active electrode yield and signal amplitude. Immunohistochemical analysis showed an increase in GFAP intensity and decreased neuronal density near the implant site. Furthermore, Piezo1-but not Piezo2-was strongly expressed in GFAP-positive astrocytes within 25 µm of the implant. Piezo2 expression appeared relatively uniform within each brain slice, both in and around the MEA implantation site across cortical layers. Our study builds on previous work by demonstrating a potential role of Piezo1 in the chronic FBR induced by MEA implantation over a 16-week period. Our findings highlight Piezo1 as the primary mechanosensitive channel driving chronic FBR, suggesting it may be a target for improving MEA design and long-term functionality.

Indexed as

AstrocytesIon ChannelsNeuronsSomatosensory CortexAnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedMaleMicroelectrodesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyIon ChannelsPiezo1 protein, ratpiezo2 protein, ratbrain–machine interfaceintracortical microelectrode arraysneural engineeringneural interfacePiezo1Piezo2

Identifiers

PMID41009567
PMCPMC12469562

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.