ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
From Early Diagnoses to New Treatments for Liver, Pancreatic, Gastric, and Colorectal Cancers Using Carbon Nanotubes: New Chances Still Underexplored.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging solubility, stability, and translation: advances in carbon nanotube-based drug delivery systems.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic, liver, gastric, colorectal, and rectal cancers (PC, LC, GC, CRC, and RC) are highly lethal tumours, with a 5-year survival rate of 10.5% (PC) and <20% (LC), and of 5%, 12%, and 13% for IV-stage GC, CRC, and RC, respectively. Currently, PC and LC represent the third leading cause of cancer-related death, while GCs and CRCs account for 4.8 million cancer cases and 4.4 million cancer deaths worldwide. Poor prognoses are mainly due to late diagnosis, limited efficacy of available treatments, tumour recurrence, as well as therapy-induced secondary tumorigenesis and drug resistance. In recent decades, these issues have been afforded using nanomaterials (NMs), with promising results. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are nonpareil nano systems, which have demonstrated high potential in both cancer diagnosis and treatment, showing to be excellent vehicles for drugs, antibodies, genes, etc. Used alone or in combination with available therapeutic strategies, such as photothermal, photodynamic, drug targeting, gene, immune, and chemotherapies, CNTs have shown notable results in laboratory settings, enhancing the anticancer effects and reducing toxic outcomes of traditional treatments. Anyway, despite PC, LC, and CRC being three of the five tumours (60%) considered the most perfidious and lethal cancers, studies on the use of these innovative NMs to cure them represent only 37% of those regarding the treatment of the most known tumours. Regarding this scenario of a worrying lack of efficient treatments for highly lethal PC, LC, GC, CRC, and RC, this umbrella review was drawn up to promote filling this gap in studies by reporting the still too limited and often obsolete experimentation on the possible use of CNTs for their diagnosis and therapy. To this end, such case studies have been collected in several informative Tables which are functional for readers, and the studies have been discussed. This study wants to sensitize scientists towards more extensive research to find novel safer applications of CNTs against PC, LC, GC, CRC, and RC, both in terms of early diagnoses and efficient treatments. Such efforts should also focus on clarifying the not yet fully unveiled toxicological aspects and regulatory hurdles, both of which persist around CNTs. Research should also be finalized to produce patents rather than journal articles, thus accelerating the translation of CNTs to clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.