ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Computational Metagenomics: State of the Art.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review: Long-Read Sequencing in Algal Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Gut microbiome and metabolic health: mechanisms and precision interventions.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- From soil to sequences: mechanisms and tools unravelling plant-rhizomicrobiome interactions.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- SARS-CoV-2 Infection disrupts lower respiratory tract microbiome function and interactions.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Integrative Bioinformatics Approaches in Environmental Biotechnology: A Review.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Review
- Metagenomics and its impact on environmental and therapeutic microbiology.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Review
- AI-powered analysis of viral metagenomic sequencing data for rapid outbreak investigation and novel pathogen discovery.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: mechanistic insights, diagnostic advances, and microbiome-based therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational metagenomics has revolutionized our understanding of the human microbiome, enabling the characterization of microbial diversity, the prediction of functional capabilities, and the identification of associations with human health outcomes. This review provides a concise yet comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art computational approaches in metagenomics, alongside widely used methods and tools employed in amplicon-based metagenomics. It is intended as an introductory resource for new researchers, outlining key methodologies, challenges, and future directions in the field. We discuss recent advances in bioinformatics pipelines, machine learning (ML) models, and integrative frameworks that are transforming our understanding of the microbiome's role in health and disease. By addressing current limitations and proposing innovative solutions, this review aims to outline a roadmap for future research and clinical translation in computational metagenomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.