ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
"Dusting Off the Cobwebs": Rethinking How We Use New Antibiotics.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends in 'Watch' and 'Reserve' Antibiotic Use in Primary Care in Kazakhstan: The Imperative for Enhancing Stewardship Strategies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance continues to escalate worldwide, threatening effective medical care, patient safety, and global health security. Traditional antibiotics are increasingly unreliable against multidrug-resistant pathogens, resulting in delayed appropriate therapy, prolonged illness, higher healthcare costs, and increased mortality. In this context, antimicrobial stewardship must evolve beyond the preservation of older drugs to include the judicious, evidence-based use of newer antibiotics. When used empirically in high-risk scenarios, novel agents can improve clinical outcomes by ensuring timely, effective coverage against MDR organisms while reducing the need for broad-spectrum combinations that drive collateral resistance and adverse effects. A major challenge, however, is the underutilization of these agents, which not only limits patient benefit but also undermines incentives for continued pharmaceutical innovation. To address this gap, stewardship programs must incorporate strategies for appropriate empiric deployment of new antibiotics, guided by local epidemiology, risk stratification, rapid diagnostics, and multidisciplinary decision-making. A coordinated global effort, linking stewardship, innovation, and policy reform, will be critical to optimize the role of novel antimicrobials in clinical practice moving forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.